|
Alastair
Gordon
Managing Director, R&D and
Brand Health Management
ACNielsen Indonesia
At the heart of
any successful product repositioning or new product launch,
is a new idea — a concept or message that is motivating
to the consumer and relevant to their needs. Concepts can
work on a number of ways to connect with the consumer, but
ACNielsen experience suggests that successful product concepts
will:
- Drive an empathetic response, making the consumer feel
connected personally
- Persuade them to take some action, or at least be willing
to investigate the concept in more depth
- Have some impact and have at least some degree of uniqueness
- Clearly articulate at least one relevant and intended
product advantage.
These dimensions,
Empathy, Persuasion, Impact and Communications are collectively
what we refer to as EPIC measures and are the key KPIs used
to evaluate Communications in the “@work” family
of services offered by CNielsen. The latest member of that
family, concepts@work, has been designed specifically to simultaneously
evaluate many concepts in a wide variety of forms in terms
of their EPIC performance scores.

This approach is
important, because it allows clients to look at the performance
of concepts on a multidimensional basis, assessing, for instance,
whether a concept that seems to score badly is in fact only
missing out on one dimension (eg, it achieves empathy, but
is does not have enough ‘impact’ in its current
form). Many other concept testing systems utilise simple performance
measures that tend to select a very similar set of “top
concepts”. Having dynamic action standards at concept
development stage is critical, because often the main aim
is to identify a set of themes that the creative agency can
develop into a variety of alternatives. Concepts@work analysis
identifies the potential of idea, not simply in terms of winners
and losers, but also by separating out ones with more “niche”
appeal and ones that may have potential despite certain flaws.

As well as producing
more useful KPIs, concepts@work is built around an understanding
that people have difficulty expressing their feelings when
faced with a multitude of similar concepts, often illustrated
with minimal artwork and/or short positioning statements.
This leads in many cases to poor discrimination between concepts.
Concepts@work utilises the capability of CAPI or online questioning
to allow respondents to directly interact with the concept
by utilising visual scaling systems.


The result is an
ability to more finely distinguish emotional and Communications
impact for even very similar concepts or ideas.
Another reason that tests of early-stage concepts of products
and services often produce confusing results is that consumers
react differently to new ideas. Concepts@work introduces a
segmentation based on new learning about how people actually
make decisions — learning that suggests that some people
are more “anchored” in their choice processes,
and are more likely to be open to concepts that resonate with
their current needs and behaviours.
Other people tend to be easier to influence and have mental
choice patterns that are more volatile. We call the latter
group “High Deltas” and refer to the former as
“High Omegas” (similar distinctions are also key
in ACNielsen’s new Qualitative service, ACNielsen |
DeltaQual). Building a picture of how the concepts work for
each type of respondent is key to understanding whether they
are likely to have longer or shorter-term appeal and if the
appeal varies with the “mind-set” of the consumer.
By linking analysis to executional objectives, plus consumer
motivations and decision-making, concepts@work can help define
a better set of concepts for further exploration, and also
provide vital clues on what needs to be refined to create
a winning concept.

|